Why the Human Jury Is Failing, and How AI Could Restore Its Purpose
In this podcast, I question one of the most respected assumptions of our judicial system: that the human jury, together with the presumption of innocence and Blackstone’s famous principle that it is better to let ten guilty people go free than convict one innocent, still serves justice as well today as it once did. My concern is not only with the innocent person wrongly convicted, but also with the innocent people who may become victims of those the system fails to hold accountable. From there, I ask whether a jury can still remain truly independent in a world saturated with media, politics, and public pressure, and whether AI may offer a way not to abolish the jury, but to rebuild it into something more transparent, more consistent, and perhaps closer to its original purpose.
Essay details