Uncompressed ThinkingIDEA EXPLORER BY LEV NEYMOTIN
Browse categories & essays

Visibility of Good and Bad

When Good Remains Quiet and Bad Becomes the Public Face of Society

Home

VISIBILITY OF GOOD AND BAD When Good Remains Quiet and Bad Becomes the Public Face of Society WHERE DID ALL THE GOOD PEOPLE GO? Bad screams in our faces, threatens, intimidates, waves its fists, and demands attention. Good quietly raises children, cares for the elderly, helps strangers, works honestly, and keeps society functioning, almost invisible. I find this contrast deeply disturbing. Looking at America and the world today, I wonder whether we are witnessing the actual moral deterioration of society or simply allowing its loudest, most aggressive elements to become its public face. What troubles me even more is the silence of millions who may privately reject what they see but hesitate to say so publicly. When Good remains silent, Bad can appear far more powerful, numerous, and socially acceptable than it really is. Eventually, this distorted image may begin changing society itself. Is Good actually losing ground, or are we increasingly unable to see it? This essay opens a larger exploration. In the sequel, I will move from abstract Good and Bad to their possible real-world expressions, examining two contrasting religious-political systems: Judaic/Hebrew Democracy, with Israel as an existing model, and Authoritarian Political Islamism, represented by a projected theocratic Caliphate. I will use them as proposed counterparts of Good and Bad, respectively, to examine how their values, political structures, and public behavior affect their visibility and influence on society. Will this comparison support my original argument, or challenge it? That is precisely what I want to find out. I invite readers to challenge my reasoning. Perhaps Good is still the overwhelming majority. But what good is that majority if nobody can see it?

Ask Lev about this
About this collection & how to use it

This collection contains 366 selected essays, research papers, proposals, and supporting documents—with or without podcasts. Introductions draw closely from the PDFs’ preambles, executive summaries, openings, and conclusions. Passages may be shortened and joined; they are close adaptations, not necessarily continuous quotations. They express the source authors’ positions, not independent verification of every claim. Contributed material is attributed separately where identifiable.

Search words in titles, summaries, topics, authors, and podcast titles. Turn on Search inside PDFs to include extractable document text. All search words must appear somewhere in a record or its PDF; use quotation marks for a phrase. A PDF result shows the first relevant file page. Text embedded in images or affected by extraction defects may not be searchable.

Dates are separate: “By Date” sorts by the original PDF file’s last modification, latest first—not its upload or copy date. “By Name” sorts A–Z. “Essay” is a document date where reliably identifiable; “Podcast” is the YouTube publication date. Missing dates are marked “Not stated” and never inferred from the recording. Year-only or month-only dates retain that precision. Newest sorts place undated items last.

317 entries have matched podcasts, representing 301 distinct recordings. A recording may discuss more than one source. 47 entries are essay-only; 2 more remain available with uncertain primary podcast links withheld. Podcasts may play directly as audio or through YouTube. PDFs here are unchanged copies, not live links to Dropbox. Retained companion papers and alternate editions remain separate.

Research concepts and proposed medical or financial methods are presented for reading and discussion, not as established treatments or individualized professional advice. A proposal’s presence here does not imply clinical validation, regulatory approval, or an investment recommendation.

Readers can browse freely. Only the signed-in author can exclude or restore essays, assign them to one or more categories, or add categories. Category counts may overlap; the overall total counts each essay once. Confirmed changes are saved in the site database; the original source inventory and PDFs remain unchanged. The PDF reader’s return bar restores your previous view. Search filters remain in the address bar. Copyright and authorship remain with the respective rights holders.

Visit statistics: This Catalog counts page views, PDF reader opens, download clicks, and YouTube link clicks for the author. It uses a temporary, random browser-tab token, not tracking cookies, and stores no names, email addresses, IP addresses, search terms, or individual browsing histories. Duplicate-prevention tokens expire after 48 hours and are removed as new events arrive. Daily totals are retained. Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control signals are respected. YouTube has its own privacy practices.

Privacy & visit counting · Download catalog (CSV) · Download catalog (JSON)

Back